Social Leadership | Understand functional areas of social leadership

Functional areas of social leadership

Studies of social movement have devoted a great deal of attention to social leadership types and leadership problem change. Max Weber’s concept of charismatic leadership has had an immense influence upon the thinking of sociologists about the sources of authority and dominance in changing political life. The “natural history” approach of many writers has stressed the decline of enthusiastic, agitation leadership and the development of statesmanlike, bureaucratic administrators as movements have become formally organized into stable structures. The approach of these studies has been on leadership changes through time as a function of different forms of structure and of different situations in which organized movements operate as they become large and institutionalized. Asia's less developed countries the question of leadership in the context of social transformation and modernization of traditional societies have been studied.

Role differentiation and leadership type

We often think about leadership as one role within the differentiated social system of groups and organizations. References to the leader perpetuate this tendency. In recent years, however, the idea of role-set has begun to sensitize sociologists to the need to distinguish carefully between a status, or social position, and the package of roles which accompany it. By virtue of occupying a particular status has role-partners who are differently located in the social structure. The president of a bank acts quite differently in interactions with his employees, his colleagues, fellow members of a bankers association or among other influential persons in his town. Each of these international situations is governed by his status as a bank administrator but each interaction expectation is different from the other in content.

Role-set control and leadership functions

So far we have conceived leadership as a status within an organized group, manifest in an office. However, a functional appraisal of leadership leads us to recognize that the duality of functions and of role-playing areas contains the possibility of conflict over the definition of the leader. This is a conflict between the external and the internal areas when leadership is conferred in one but rejected in another. The public may accept as the leader of a movement have rejected. The “popular hero” may perform a considerable amount of articulating or even mobilizing functions without having the imprimatur of an official position.

Such a person is able to perform functions in one area without being subject to the controls of the other part of the role-set. A functional conception of leadership, we maintain. Is a better tool for the analysis of the social movement than are analytical schemes which depict leadership as a specific role residing in a specific person. In all these countries the major obstacles to economic growth and human development with widespread poverty, illiteracy, disease, and were.

The success of modern political independence after the receipt of strategic path to economic and social freedom as had been employed by the national leadership. Social change and modernization in this context, leaders from traditional to modern society is considered essential for the smooth transition and smooth transition from traditional to modern society and the role of local and national leaders had the nation as envisaged in the new value institutions and structures that would embody this new set of value propagation.